Five rival parties, including the Minjoo Party of Korea, the Liberty Korea Party, the Bareun Future Party, the Democratic Peace Party, and the Justice Party, are fighting over the details. The agreement on the reform of the electoral system, including the introduction of an interlinked proportional representation system, which was developed dramatically on the 15th. In particular, the Democratic Party and the Korean Party are still reacting "warmly" to the introduction of the interlinked proportional representation system, while presenting different positions on the agreement, Toh. In other words, each party is taking the same phrase differently.
For example, one can see the meaning of "review" differently from "experience a detailed plan for the introduction of a linked proportional representation system" or "reviews including expansion within 10 percent" in "review."
There are also mixed views on the agreement, which calls for the revision of the law on reforming the electoral system and immediately start discussions on constitutional amendment to improve the power structure. For example, he makes a different interpretation on whether to focus on the revision of the bill or the discussion on constitutional amendment at the original point.
The sound of rupture began on the 16th. Sim Sang-jung ad hoc committee on political reform (the Special Committee on the intention of amendment.) chairman the morning on December 16, the proportioning single lever type of proportional representation system, hinting the 'who signed integer can increase more than 10 percent' through a news conference.He offered as a starting point of discussion.
However, the Liberty Korea Party said in a commentary on the same day, "It is not true at all that the Liberty Korea Party finally agreed to introduce an interlinked proportional representation system. The agreement between the two parties is neither an expansion of the number of lawmakers nor the introduction of a linked proportional representation system."
the Korean Party with a parliamentary cabinet system
The coalition-type proportional representation system is a system that is coordinated and harmonized with the parliamentary cabinet system."
The Liberty Korea Party (LDP) has also begun a "water ride" on Wednesday. "It's just a review agreement that the Liberty Korea Party will actively and openly review various electoral districts, including the coalition-style proportional representation system," said Na Kyung-won, floor leader of the Korean party, at an emergency meeting of the ruling party on the morning of the same day. "I'll make it clear once again that I didn't agree with the expansion of the parliamentary seats, and that I never agreed on any election relief."
"It is clear that some politicians are making the introduction of the linked proportional representation system into a factual fact," Na said. "The agreement states that the number of lawmakers is extended or not, and we have never agreed on whether or not to expand the number of lawmakers."
In particular, "a constitutional amendment, paragraph 6. agreement, one point referred to talk." said Moon Jae-in, accept the amendment of the president was one point, a parliamentary and parliamentary elements.Take to show clearly what must speak up. " Moon Jae-in and parliamentary cabinet system came with a president to display the proportioning single lever type only for the introduction of proportional representation for the support is simply second fiddle to political parties.An attempt to neutralize the checks of opposition parties in the empirical presidential system, and head--on, a claim.The main opposition Minjoo Party of Korea is not as explicit as the Liberal Korea Party, but it still remains lukewarm about the introduction of a linked proportional representation system. "Although discussion at the National Assembly is important, we will do our best to come up with a plan to reform the electoral system that the people agree on," said Democratic Party floor leader Hong Young-pyo at a meeting of the supreme council on Thursday morning.
Park Kwang-on, a supreme council member, also stressed, "The criteria for reforming the electoral system should be the people's choice, not the understanding of the party."
"So far, people seem to agree with the intention of expanding their entry into the minor parties by minimizing their resignations and enhancing their proportion," he said. "However, if the system itself is linked to the power structure, something unruly will happen."
"When we significantly expand the proportional representation system, we raise concerns about how each party chooses its proportional representation system," he said in a reserved stance. In fact, he expressed negative regret over the introduction of the "interactive proportional representation system" through the expansion of the number of lawmakers in consideration of the public.
In fact, Democratic Party (DP) and Korean party officials, who will lead the discussion on reforming the electoral system, have responded with one voice to reject the introduction of a "interlinked proportional representation system" and the expansion of the number of lawmakers.
Kim Jong-min, the Democratic Party's secretary for political reform, said on his Facebook page on Wednesday, "The leaders of the ruling and opposition parties are trying to negotiate the election law politically, but if we really want to revise the election law, we need to get the consent of all the lawmakers and the people."
Chung Yoo-seop, secretary of the Korean party's special committee for political reform, also criticized on Facebook on the same day, saying, "The coalition's proportional representation system is an unreasonable argument by certain political parties to create an election system that is advantageous to their political parties strategically by increasing the number of lawmakers."
Opposition parties started to smoke in a different way. Pity + Gattan"
The three opposition parties (the Bareun Mirae Party, the Democratic Peace Party, and the Justice Party) that staged picket rallies to introduce the system immediately protested.
The Bareun Future Party said in a commentary on Monday, "It is regrettable and deplorable that the two parties' remarks that undermine the purpose of the "proportional proportional representation system" agreement, which is a promise with the people, are undermining the purpose of the "proportional proportional representation system," adding, "We should not give up even the promises we made against the people because of the party's partisan interests of the vested rights."
"The Korean Party has begun to make a different response to the reform of the electoral system," said Park Joo-hyun, the party's chief spokesman, in a commentary.
"If the main opposition Minjoo Party of Korea and the Liberty Korea Party agree on an interlinked proportional representation system but try to thwart it or push for a ridiculous mix, the opposition parties will find out in detail the truth of the alliance with the civil society and make sure to judge it warned.
"The Liberty Korea Party should make a pledge to actively participate in discussions to introduce an interlinked proportional representation system before asking the president to reveal his position on the parliamentary cabinet system," the Justice Party said.메이저사이트
Regarding this, Chung Ho-jin, a spokesman for the Justice Party, said, "It's time for the National Assembly to focus on the interlinked proportional representation system."
"While the Liberty Korea Party is also well aware of the large opposition to the parliamentary cabinet system, it is no different from just saying that it will stop the discussion," he said. "The Liberty Korea Party should quickly come up with detailed measures on the linked proportional representation system."